Deconstruction in Qohelet: A Response to Mark Sneed
Ecclesiastes has received a number of postmodern-styled readings in recent decades. One such piece by Mark Sneed distinguishes itself by applying deconstructive methods to show Qohelet's internal contradictions. Although Sneed's argument is helpful and illuminating, certain aspects of Derr...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Обзор |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2015
|
| В: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Год: 2015, Том: 40, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 239-256 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Kohelet
/ Derrida, Jacques 1930-2004
/ Деконструкция
|
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Vanity
B Deconstruction B Derrida B Ecclesiastes B Рецензия B Method B Eternity B Qohelet |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Не электронный вид
|
| Итог: | Ecclesiastes has received a number of postmodern-styled readings in recent decades. One such piece by Mark Sneed distinguishes itself by applying deconstructive methods to show Qohelet's internal contradictions. Although Sneed's argument is helpful and illuminating, certain aspects of Derrida's articulation of ‘deconstruction’ are not well represented. In this article, an alternative ‘deconstruction’ of Qohelet is offered which attempts to witness to tensions within the text instead of applying predetermined concepts from outside. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089215611547 |
