Nelson, R. D. (2005). The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History: The Case is Still Compelling. Journal for the study of the Old Testament, 29(3), 319-337. doi:10.1177/0309089205053477
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationNelson, Richard D. "The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History: The Case Is Still Compelling." Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 29, no. 3 (2005): 319-337, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089205053477.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationNelson, Richard D. "The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History: The Case Is Still Compelling." Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, vol. 29, no. 3, 2005, pp. 319-337, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089205053477.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.