A Critical Binarism: Source Criticism and Deconstructive Criticism
When classifying the array of interpretive methods currently available, biblical critics regularly distinguish between historical-critical methods, on the one hand, and literary critical methods, on the other. Frequently, methods on one side of the divide are said to be antagonistic to certain metho...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2002
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2002, Volume: 26, Issue: 4, Pages: 3-28 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1777011337 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221214161216.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211110s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/030908920202600401 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1777011337 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1777011337 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mathewson, Daniel B. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Critical Binarism: Source Criticism and Deconstructive Criticism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a When classifying the array of interpretive methods currently available, biblical critics regularly distinguish between historical-critical methods, on the one hand, and literary critical methods, on the other. Frequently, methods on one side of the divide are said to be antagonistic to certain methods on the other. This article examines two such presumed antagonistic methods, source criticism and deconstructive criticism, and argues that they are not, in fact, antagonistic, but similar: both are postmodern movements, and both share an interpretive methodology (insofar as it is correct to speak of a deconstructive methodology). This argument is illustrated with a source-critical and a deconstructive reading of Exodus 14. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of the Old Testament |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1976 |g 26(2002), 4, Seite 3-28 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34135550X |w (DE-600)2068281-5 |w (DE-576)10337356X |x 1476-6728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2002 |g number:4 |g pages:3-28 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1645502880 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/030908920202600401 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4000920863 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1777011337 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110045837 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-07-29#00B5164C82BD492AC9D54F0303AF064557BA37EB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||