RT Article
T1 A Response to Richard Bauckham and Heike Omerzu
JF Journal for the study of the New Testament
VO 37
IS 2
SP 210
OP 218
A1 Watson, Francis 1956-
LA English
PB Sage
YR 2014
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1776996542
AB My two reviewers choose to focus on the central section of my book and to pass over its wider argument, which is an attempt to rehabilitate the canonical form of the fourfold gospel as an object of study in its own right. Both reviewers are understandably preoccupied with my critique of the Q hypothesis and with the ‘L/M’ and ‘SC’ hypotheses with which I propose to replace it, and much of my response is therefore concerned with these issues. I also engage with Bauckham’s attempt to distance non-canonical gospel texts from the canonical ones, and with Omerzu’s proposed ‘complexity theory’ of gospel origins.
K1 Q
K1 Gospel
K1 Canon
DO 10.1177/0142064X14557605