A New Synoptic Problem: Mark Goodacre and Simon Gathercole on Thomas
Recent analyses of the Gospel of Thomas by Mark Goodacre and Simon Gathercole make only a partial and, in several instances, unconvincing case for Thomas’s knowledge of the Synoptic Gospels. Other neglected data suggests that some portions of Thomas are substantially autonomous. This calls for a mor...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Critique |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2014
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Année: 2014, Volume: 36, Numéro: 3, Pages: 199-239 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Evangelium Thomae
/ Bibel. Synoptische Evangelien
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Non-canonical Gospels
B Gospel of Thomas B Synoptic Problem B ancient schools B Compte-rendu de lecture B Literary Dependence B gnomological literature |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | Recent analyses of the Gospel of Thomas by Mark Goodacre and Simon Gathercole make only a partial and, in several instances, unconvincing case for Thomas’s knowledge of the Synoptic Gospels. Other neglected data suggests that some portions of Thomas are substantially autonomous. This calls for a more complex understanding of the composition of Thomas, one that recognizes its construction as a ‘school text’ or ‘anthology’, drawing on multiple and parallel streams of the Jesus tradition. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X14520653 |
