John for Readers of Mark? A Response to Richard Bauckham’s Proposal
This article is a response to Richard Bauckham’s second contribution to the influential volume The Gospels for All Christians, in which he proposes that the Fourth Gospel was not written specifically for the Johannine community but for Christians in general. Following a general summary of his argume...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2003
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2003, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 449-468 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1776991206 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219180622.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211110s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0142064X0302500404 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1776991206 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1776991206 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1038727189 |0 (DE-627)766402509 |0 (DE-576)184124794 |4 aut |a North, Wendy E. Sproston | |
| 109 | |a North, Wendy E. Sproston |a Sproston North, Wendy E. |a Sproston-North, Wendy E. |a North, Wendy E. S. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a John for Readers of Mark? A Response to Richard Bauckham’s Proposal |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is a response to Richard Bauckham’s second contribution to the influential volume The Gospels for All Christians, in which he proposes that the Fourth Gospel was not written specifically for the Johannine community but for Christians in general. Following a general summary of his argument, the response focuses largely on Bauckham’s exegesis of Jn 11.2, which, he claims, was unequivocally directed to readers who knew Mark’s Gospel but who had no knowledge of distinctively Johannine traditions. In the main section, Bauckham’s argument is summarized under five points, each of which is answered by detailed comment. This investigation finds that his interpretation of 11.2, which is the single basis upon which his whole case is constructed, is flawed. | ||
| 601 | |a Richard | ||
| 601 | |a Bauckham, Richard | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of the New Testament |d London : Sage, 1978 |g 25(2003), 4, Seite 449-468 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341347906 |w (DE-600)2067510-0 |w (DE-576)099025957 |x 1745-5294 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2003 |g number:4 |g pages:449-468 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X0302500404 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4000898418 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1776991206 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110045735 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#EAE6CD0C1B385BA0483D8A6B11B8F14D5F0BE1DD | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||