'Salted With Fire' (Mark 9.42-50): Style, Oracles and (Socio)Rhetorical Gospel Criticism

Recent rhetorical criticism of the Gospels has tended to focus on formal 'patterns of argumentation' and on their redactional variation in Gospel literary tradition. Partly from fear of backsliding into aesthetic and/or devotional readings, partly from impatience to differentiate specific...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henderson, Ian H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2001
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2001, Volume: 23, Issue: 80, Pages: 44-65
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1776990641
003 DE-627
005 20221219180847.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211110s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0142064X0102308003  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776990641 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776990641 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Henderson, Ian H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Henderson, Ian H.  |a Henderson, Ian 
245 1 0 |a 'Salted With Fire' (Mark 9.42-50): Style, Oracles and (Socio)Rhetorical Gospel Criticism 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent rhetorical criticism of the Gospels has tended to focus on formal 'patterns of argumentation' and on their redactional variation in Gospel literary tradition. Partly from fear of backsliding into aesthetic and/or devotional readings, partly from impatience to differentiate specific social movements within early Christianity, New Testament rhetorical criticism has analysed the Gospels essentially from the argumentation-theoretical angle of their presumed displays and specializations of conventional rationalities. Style variation and characterization are treated more as elements in formal argumentation than as persuasive in themselves.The article explores Jesus' strange yet pivotal speech in Mk 9.42-50 to illustrate the inadequacy of an argumentation theory focused on enthymemes and chreias to account for Markan oracular speech (logia). Mk 9.42-50 is often read as an instance of catchword agglomeration, yet it is one of the Markan Jesus' few major speeches. The speech does have a discernable purpose, not only in the Markan narrative con text, but in itself as a rhetorical unit: Jesus is placing Mark's readers under a curse of office as leaders. Neither Matthew nor Luke found the Markan Jesus' speech sufficiently persuasive in its imprecatory rhetoric to warrant imitation. We must entertain the possibility that here and elsewhere Markan rhetoric demanded too much of either its implied or its historical audiences: Markan rhetorics may have proven too experimental to secure early Christian audiences. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the study of the New Testament  |d London : Sage, 1978  |g 23(2001), 80, Seite 44-65  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341347906  |w (DE-600)2067510-0  |w (DE-576)099025957  |x 1745-5294  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2001  |g number:80  |g pages:44-65 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X0102308003  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000897853 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776990641 
LOK |0 005 20211110045731 
LOK |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#7023F45CEF47D2D8C0AB57F0FEE8693FDD15DFE1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB 

Similar Items

more