On the (Mis)Definition of Q

Important developments in the study of the Sayings Tradition (Q) and growing aware ness of this issue beyond critical circles demand renewed attention to how the Sayings Tradition is defined and to the terminology by which it is described. Definitions based upon where this tradition is found or how...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Broadhead, Edwin K. 1955- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 1998
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 1998, Volume: 20, Issue: 68, Pages: 3-12
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Important developments in the study of the Sayings Tradition (Q) and growing aware ness of this issue beyond critical circles demand renewed attention to how the Sayings Tradition is defined and to the terminology by which it is described. Definitions based upon where this tradition is found or how it was used are no longer adequate. Future descriptions must be based upon the fundamental identity of this tradition and upon its role in the development of early Christianity. Furthermore, it is time to rethink the terminology by which we refer to the collection of Jesus' sayings. The relevance of the designation 'Q' is questionable, and the propriety of speaking of a Sayings Gospel is debatable. In light of these problems, new terminology is proposed, and a more descriptive definition of the Sayings Tradition is offered.
ISSN:1745-5294
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9802006801