Reclaiming Schleiermacher for Twenty-first Century Atonement Theory: The Human and the Divine in Feminist Christology

In the wake of important scholarship on Jesus’ humanity, feminist chris-tology suffers from a struggle to articulate the divinity of Jesus Christ because of its criticism of sacrificial atonement theory, which has led to didactic or exemplary models of redemption. Feminist theology stands in need of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Streufert, Mary J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2006
In: Feminist theology
Year: 2006, Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: 98-120
Further subjects:B Incarnation
B Atonement
B Schleiermacher
B Christology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1776893786
003 DE-627
005 20211110045216.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211110s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0966735006068852  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776893786 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776893786 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Streufert, Mary J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reclaiming Schleiermacher for Twenty-first Century Atonement Theory: The Human and the Divine in Feminist Christology 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the wake of important scholarship on Jesus’ humanity, feminist chris-tology suffers from a struggle to articulate the divinity of Jesus Christ because of its criticism of sacrificial atonement theory, which has led to didactic or exemplary models of redemption. Feminist theology stands in need of further discussion in an effort to articulate feminist incarnational atonement theory more thoroughly. Schleiermacher’s theology, especially as it is articulated in his theory of preaching, aids feminist theology in claiming Jesus’ divinity while simultaneously maintaining criticism of a violent atonement and relocating the power of the incarnation away from Jesus’ maleness to the preached Word in the community. The basis of feminist incarnational atonement theory is initially found within four major areas of dialogue: in a central focus on Jesus’ life, in definitions of redemption, in the centrality of community, and in criticism of the violence of the atonement. 
601 |a Feminist 
601 |a Christologie 
650 4 |a Atonement 
650 4 |a Incarnation 
650 4 |a Christology 
650 4 |a Schleiermacher 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Feminist theology  |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1992  |g 15(2006), 1, Seite 98-120  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341897612  |w (DE-600)2069502-0  |w (DE-576)254072119  |x 1745-5189  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2006  |g number:1  |g pages:98-120 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1644914174  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735006068852  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2006  |e 1  |h 98-120 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000800841 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776893786 
LOK |0 005 20211110045216 
LOK |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-07-28#35875610C469E27D18C8E83656E227A63260552B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw