On Non-Docility and Indecent Theologians: A Response to the Panel for Indecent Theology
Althaus-Reid describes her work, Indecent Theology, as a reflection on sexuality from the perspective of an Argentinian liberation theology, critical queer theory and a theology of camp self-disclosure. As such, it is a diasporic, postcolonial theology concerned to critique accepted ideas of essenti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2003
|
In: |
Feminist theology
Year: 2003, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 182-189 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Althaus-Reid describes her work, Indecent Theology, as a reflection on sexuality from the perspective of an Argentinian liberation theology, critical queer theory and a theology of camp self-disclosure. As such, it is a diasporic, postcolonial theology concerned to critique accepted ideas of essentialism and to question theology's status as a universal discourse. Althaus-Reid responds to the suggestions and criticisms of the panel members and views her ongoing project as one of doing queer theology from a 'non-vanilla' Argentinian perspective and with a vision for queer holiness in theology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5189 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Feminist theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/096673500301100208 |