Quaestio Disputata Response to Neil Ormerod, and Beyond
In an article in the September 2007 issue of this journal, Neil Ormerod had included David Coffey in his critique of Rahner, whose thought he had contrasted with Lonergan's on the Trinity and related subjects. Ormerod's article was occasioned by publicity given by Robert Doran to a trinita...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2007
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2007, Volume: 68, Issue: 4, Pages: 900-915 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In an article in the September 2007 issue of this journal, Neil Ormerod had included David Coffey in his critique of Rahner, whose thought he had contrasted with Lonergan's on the Trinity and related subjects. Ormerod's article was occasioned by publicity given by Robert Doran to a trinitarian hypothesis of Lonergan. Here Coffey comments on the hypothesis itself and Ormerod's treatment of his theology, then further develops a point from his own Christology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/004056390706800407 |