Healthcare Resource Allocation and the ‘Recovery of Virtue’

This paper maps the different levels of the problem of healthcare resource allocation — micro, macro and international — with reference to three cases. It is argued that two standard approaches to the issue of distributive justice in healthcare, the QALY (quality-adjusted life year) approach and the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Messer, Neil (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2005
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2005, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-108
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1776581121
003 DE-627
005 20211110232439.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211110s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0953946805052127  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776581121 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776581121 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)103121397X  |0 (DE-627)736003622  |0 (DE-576)17697007X  |4 aut  |a Messer, Neil 
109 |a Messer, Neil  |a Messer, Neil G. 
245 1 0 |a Healthcare Resource Allocation and the ‘Recovery of Virtue’ 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper maps the different levels of the problem of healthcare resource allocation — micro, macro and international — with reference to three cases. It is argued that two standard approaches to the issue of distributive justice in healthcare, the QALY (quality-adjusted life year) approach and the social-contract approach developed by Norman Daniels, are fundamentally unsatisfactory for reasons identified by Alasdair MacIntyre. Although the virtue theory articulated by MacIntyre and others has been influential in many areas of healthcare ethics, there seems to have been relatively little discussion of the difference it might make to the problems of resource allocation. The potential of such an approach is explored in the later sections of the paper. Two apparently promising ways of bringing virtue ethics to bear on resource allocation are examined and found wanting to greater or lesser extents. Firstly, Beauchamp and Childress’s account of the virtues as a supplement to their ‘Four Principles’ is found to have little or no substantive contribution to make to this issue. Secondly, the ‘liberal communitarian’ system of resource allocation proposed by Ezekiel Emanuel, while a considerable improvement on the account of Beauchamp and Childress, remains problematic in some respects. An alternative Christian account is developed by identifying significant influences that might shape the ‘political prudence’ which would enable Christian communities to form sound judgments about distributive justice in healthcare. The paper concludes with some remarks about the relationship between this tradition-constituted account and the wider public sphere of policy-making and practice. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Studies in Christian ethics  |d London : Sage, 1988  |g 18(2005), 1, Seite 89-108  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)368910555  |w (DE-600)2118000-3  |w (DE-576)11946067X  |x 0953-9468  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:89-108 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946805052127  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000487574 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776581121 
LOK |0 005 20211110043334 
LOK |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#385A3F65ACD48D1419721E3FF5D592E74E8198EE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw