Disability rights and religious liberty in education: the story behind Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District

"This book project analyzes the social context of, and the judicial rulings in the case of, Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)--a lawsuit with considerable significance for disability and church-state jurisprudence. The question brought before the U.S. Supreme Court by the par...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Dierenfield, Bruce J. 1951- (Автор) ; Gerber, David A. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс
Язык:Английский
Слжба доставки Subito: Заказать сейчас.
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Chicago University of Illinois Press [2020]
В:Год: 2020
Обзоры:[Rezension von: Disability rights and religious liberty in education] (2021) (Wenger, Regina B.)
Серии журналов/журналы:Disability histories
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Право инвалидов / Свобода вероисповедания / Школа (мотив) / Воспитание (мотив) / USA
Индексация IxTheo:KBQ Северная Америка
SA Церковное право
Другие ключевые слова:B People with disabilities Legal status, laws, etc (United States)
B Deaf children Education
B Deaf Education
B Freedom Of Religion (United States) History
B People with disabilities
B LAW / Генерал
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:"This book project analyzes the social context of, and the judicial rulings in the case of, Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)--a lawsuit with considerable significance for disability and church-state jurisprudence. The question brought before the U.S. Supreme Court by the parents of James Zobrest, a resident of Arizona who is profoundly hearing impaired, was whether James might continue to receive tax-supported sign-language interpretation when, in the absence of public high schools in his area, he moved from a public middle school to Salpointe Catholic High School. When local school officials denied the Zobrests' request on the ground that compliance with it would have the "primary effect of promoting religion," the Zobrests hired a sign-language interpreter at crippling personal expense and also filed suit against the school district, arguing that its opposition to their funding request violated both the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to choose for reasons of faith to send their son to a Catholic high school and the recently passed Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which required states to facilitate the education of children with disabilities"--
Примечание:Includes bibliographical references and index
ISBN:0252052080