Text–Work–Manuscript: What Is an ‘Old Testament Pseudepigraphon’?
The 2013 volume Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures, edited by Richard Bauckham, James R. Davila and Alexander Panayotov, is a highly important contribution to the field of Pseudepigrapha studies, making previously unpublished material available for further study. This review...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
2015
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Year: 2015, 卷: 25, 發布: 2, Pages: 150-165 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Pseudepigraphen
/ 版
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
The Book of Noah
B The Story of Melchizedek B Pseudepigrapha and method B editorial paradigms B Transmission B Manuscripts |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | 電子
|
| 總結: | The 2013 volume Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures, edited by Richard Bauckham, James R. Davila and Alexander Panayotov, is a highly important contribution to the field of Pseudepigrapha studies, making previously unpublished material available for further study. This review essay discusses the editorial strategies that have shaped this volume, focusing in particular on the representation of its basic building block, the pseudepigraphon. Exploring two entries in the volume, ‘The Book of Noah’ and ‘The Story of Melchizedek with the Melchizedek Legend and the Chronicon Paschale’, this article demonstrates how privileging the early ‘work’ as the default mode of representation creates imaginations of pseudepigrapha that may not match the manuscript sources that have in fact survived. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5286 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0951820715621202 |