Colpa o rischio?: Sulla coesistenza di due princìpi e sulla loro difficile legittimazione morale

This article aims to highlight the «eternal» character of the arguments put forward in favor or against the moral legitimacy of penal sanctions. Contemporary dis-cussions tend to replace the criterion of guilt with that of the risk of recidivism and, in doing so, impose a paradigm shift on the entir...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bondolfi, Alberto 1946- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Italian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Annali di studi religiosi
Year: 2013, Volume: 14, Pages: 81-97
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1776216423
003 DE-627
005 20211104161137.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211104s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c
024 7 |a 10.14598/Annali_studi_relig_14201306  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776216423 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776216423 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)115735259  |0 (DE-627)077437462  |0 (DE-576)166992968  |4 aut  |a Bondolfi, Alberto  |d 1946- 
109 |a Bondolfi, Alberto 1946-  |a Bondolfi, A. 1946- 
245 1 0 |a Colpa o rischio?  |b Sulla coesistenza di due princìpi e sulla loro difficile legittimazione morale 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article aims to highlight the «eternal» character of the arguments put forward in favor or against the moral legitimacy of penal sanctions. Contemporary dis-cussions tend to replace the criterion of guilt with that of the risk of recidivism and, in doing so, impose a paradigm shift on the entire judicial system. It is argued that, from a moral point of view, this paradigm shift has clear limits. Moreover, the undifferentiated use of the criterion of «dangerousness» in the context of penal sanctions is shown to be highly problematic also when considered from a theological perspective. The article argues for an intermediate position. On the one hand, significance is conceded to the category of dangerousness; on the other hand, it is insisted that this significance must be thought of as constrained by the rules of a law that respects the fundamental rights of every person. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Annali di studi religiosi  |d Trento : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2000  |g 14(2013), Seite 81-97  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)788845594  |w (DE-600)2775225-2  |w (DE-576)408414685  |x 2284-3892  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2013  |g pages:81-97 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.14598/Annali_studi_relig_14201306  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3999162023 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776216423 
LOK |0 005 20211104160811 
LOK |0 008 211104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 04-11-21  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL