Bonhoeffer, Schmitt, and the state of exception
In this article I examine the concept of ‘the extraordinary’ in two Bonhoeffer books, Discipleship and Ethics. Through a comparison with Carl Schmitt’s political concept of ‘the state of exception’, I draw attention to the political theology that I argue lies inherent in Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The con...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Sage Publ.
2013
|
Στο/Στη: |
Pacifica
Έτος: 2013, Τόμος: 26, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 246-264 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
state of exception
B Giorgio Agamben B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B Carl Schmitt B Political Theology |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Μη ηλεκτρονικά
|
Σύνοψη: | In this article I examine the concept of ‘the extraordinary’ in two Bonhoeffer books, Discipleship and Ethics. Through a comparison with Carl Schmitt’s political concept of ‘the state of exception’, I draw attention to the political theology that I argue lies inherent in Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The contemporary application of this lies in the use of Bonhoeffer and the idea of ‘exception’ in contemporary American political discourse since 9/11. I investigate the consequences of this using Giorgio Agamben’s critique that states of exceptions lead to violence without reference. I address two objections to my reading of Bonhoeffer, and the political theology that I argue arises out of Bonhoeffer’s concept of the ‘extraordinary’. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1839-2598 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Pacifica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1030570X13502135 |