Bonhoeffer, Schmitt, and the state of exception

In this article I examine the concept of ‘the extraordinary’ in two Bonhoeffer books, Discipleship and Ethics. Through a comparison with Carl Schmitt’s political concept of ‘the state of exception’, I draw attention to the political theology that I argue lies inherent in Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The con...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Brown, Petra (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Sage Publ. 2013
Στο/Στη: Pacifica
Έτος: 2013, Τόμος: 26, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 246-264
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B state of exception
B Giorgio Agamben
B Dietrich Bonhoeffer
B Carl Schmitt
B Political Theology
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Παράλληλη έκδοση:Μη ηλεκτρονικά
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:In this article I examine the concept of ‘the extraordinary’ in two Bonhoeffer books, Discipleship and Ethics. Through a comparison with Carl Schmitt’s political concept of ‘the state of exception’, I draw attention to the political theology that I argue lies inherent in Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The contemporary application of this lies in the use of Bonhoeffer and the idea of ‘exception’ in contemporary American political discourse since 9/11. I investigate the consequences of this using Giorgio Agamben’s critique that states of exceptions lead to violence without reference. I address two objections to my reading of Bonhoeffer, and the political theology that I argue arises out of Bonhoeffer’s concept of the ‘extraordinary’.
ISSN:1839-2598
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Pacifica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/1030570X13502135