Divine order and secular social science in Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America

Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America can be read as an extended anthropological comparison of hierarchical and egalitarian societies (‘aristocracies’ and ‘democracies,’ in his terms). In its use of comparative method, it is strikingly modern, almost post-modern: secular social science. And y...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Handler, Richard 1950- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2021
In: Religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 566-576
Further subjects:B secular social science
B democracy in America
B Alexis de Tocqueville
B Comparison
B Divine Knowledge
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1774730154
003 DE-627
005 20211025114917.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211022s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0048721X.2021.1971499  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1774730154 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1774730154 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)170566536  |0 (DE-627)060673710  |0 (DE-576)166814326  |4 aut  |a Handler, Richard  |d 1950- 
109 |a Handler, Richard 1950- 
245 1 0 |a Divine order and secular social science in Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America can be read as an extended anthropological comparison of hierarchical and egalitarian societies (‘aristocracies’ and ‘democracies,’ in his terms). In its use of comparative method, it is strikingly modern, almost post-modern: secular social science. And yet, for Tocqueville, divine knowledge provided another comparative perspective. In this essay, I explore the implications of Tocqueville’s consideration of divine order for his work as a seemingly secular comparative anthropologist. I argue that one of the foundational concepts of secular social science, ‘society,’ may not be universally applicable since, as Tocqueville’s work suggests, it is ill-suited for the study of people who thought of their world as a divine, not a social, order. 
650 4 |a secular social science 
650 4 |a Divine Knowledge 
650 4 |a Comparison 
650 4 |a democracy in America 
650 4 |a Alexis de Tocqueville 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971  |g 51(2021), 4, Seite 566-576  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)268128154  |w (DE-600)1471703-7  |w (DE-576)104344660  |x 1096-1151  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:566-576 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1971499  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3994200024 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1774730154 
LOK |0 005 20211022042641 
LOK |0 008 211022||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-21#8ADEB92F5BF2F5A3DBC89CE47FCB51919352EFEE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL