The secular and the global: rethinking the anthropology of Christianity in the wake of 1492
In this article, I call for anthropologists of Christianity to do more to address the ‘difference’ that 1492 has made in Christian institutions, practices, and social worlds. In so doing, I argue the most significant condition constraining critical analyses of Christianity is not modernity’s secular...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2021
|
| In: |
Religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 577-592 |
| Further subjects: | B
Secular
B Theopolitics B anthropology of Christianity B Difference B 1492 B Political Theology B Global |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 177427843X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211018084547.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211016s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0048721X.2021.1971500 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)177427843X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP177427843X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1198945664 |0 (DE-627)1681156652 |4 aut |a Oliphant, Elayne | |
| 109 | |a Oliphant, Elayne |a Oliphant, Elayne Mary | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The secular and the global: rethinking the anthropology of Christianity in the wake of 1492 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article, I call for anthropologists of Christianity to do more to address the ‘difference’ that 1492 has made in Christian institutions, practices, and social worlds. In so doing, I argue the most significant condition constraining critical analyses of Christianity is not modernity’s secularity, but, what Jared Hickman has called its ‘global’ condition. I push back against attempts to integrate Christian theology into anthropological analyses in ways that protect religious life from the violence and exploitation found in social worlds. Instead, I argue that analytical tools developed in political theology and theopolitics can help anthropologists to address how, following 1492, Christianity has often been accompanied by attempts to annihilate ontological difference. In addition, anthropologists of Christianity are well positioned to seek out those ‘incarnations’ that elide the eradication of difference. | ||
| 601 | |a Anthropologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Difference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secular | |
| 650 | 4 | |a anthropology of Christianity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theopolitics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 1492 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 1971 |g 51(2021), 4, Seite 577-592 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)268128154 |w (DE-600)1471703-7 |w (DE-576)104344660 |x 1096-1151 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:577-592 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2021.1971500 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3990589849 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 177427843X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211016042650 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-10-15#6847914BDCDAC9D5FF2971753CA5D62001A26E38 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||