Seven Gay Texts: Biblical Passages Used to Condemn Homosexuality
There are seven texts often cited by Christians to condemn homosexuality: Noah and Ham (Genesis 9:20–27), Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:1–11), Levitical laws condemning same-sex relationships (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13), two words in two Second Testament vice lists (1 Corinthians 6:9–10; 1 Timothy 1:1...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2015
|
| В: |
Biblical theology bulletin
Год: 2015, Том: 45, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 68-87 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel
/ Гомосексуальность (мотив)
/ Обвинительный приговор
|
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Levitical Laws
B cultic prostitution B Homosexuality B Sodom B Ham B pederasty B Vice Lists B Isis Cult in Rome B letter to Romans B Paul B Отвес (строительство) B Noah |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Не электронный вид
|
| Итог: | There are seven texts often cited by Christians to condemn homosexuality: Noah and Ham (Genesis 9:20–27), Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:1–11), Levitical laws condemning same-sex relationships (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13), two words in two Second Testament vice lists (1 Corinthians 6:9–10; 1 Timothy 1:10), and Paul's letter to the Romans (Romans 1:26–27). The author believes that these do not refer to homosexual relationships between two free, adult, and loving individuals. They describe rape or attempted rape (Genesis 9:20–27, 19:1–11), cultic prostitution (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13), male prostitution and pederasty (1 Corinthians 6:9–10; 1 Timothy 1:10), and the Isis cult in Rome (Romans 1:26–27). If the biblical authors did assume homosexuality was evil, we do not theologize off of their cultural assumptions, we theologize off of the texts we have in the canon. The author attempts to introduce some new arguments into this long-standing and passionate debate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1945-7596 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Biblical theology bulletin
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0146107915577097 |
