The Recovery of the Nazirite in Carolingian Discourse

Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rid...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Journal of the bible and its reception
Autor principal: Lahav, Rina (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: De Gruyter 2021
Em: Journal of the bible and its reception
Ano: 2021, Volume: 8, Número: 1, Páginas: 61-78
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Hrabanus, Maurus 780-856 / Radbert, Corbie, Abt, Heiliger 785-865 / Simson, Personagem bíblico / Nazireu / Recepção / Fränkisches Reich / História 687-840
Classificações IxTheo:HB Antigo Testamento
KAD Alta Idade Média
Outras palavras-chave:B Paschasius Radbertus
B Hrabanus Maurus
B Carolingian period
B Nazirite
B Samson
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rider may fall backward. I will look for thy salvation, O Lord” (Gen 49:17-8). While in some sources, the blessing given to Dan in Genesis 49:17 is interpreted as foreshadowing Christ, in others it is seen as reflecting the Antichrist. In this article, I explore how these Carolingian exegetes rose to the challenge of this conflict, by the examining the sources for both approaches available to them. I argue that both exegetes engaged with the sources in a manner that bypassed the paradox, each choosing a different way to do so.
ISSN:2329-4434
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal of the bible and its reception
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0003