The Recovery of the Nazirite in Carolingian Discourse

Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rid...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Lahav, Rina (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: De Gruyter 2021
In: Journal of the bible and its reception
Year: 2021, 卷: 8, 发布: 1, Pages: 61-78
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hrabanus, Maurus 780-856 / Radbert, Corbie, Abt, Heiliger 785-865 / Simson, 圣经人物 / 拿细耳人 / 接受 / Fränkisches Reich / 历史 687-840
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages
Further subjects:B Paschasius Radbertus
B Hrabanus Maurus
B Carolingian period
B Nazirite
B Samson
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:Carolingian exegetes Hrabanus Maurus and Paschasius Radbertus encountered a paradox in the sources available to them regarding the prophecy of Dan and its representative Samson, the archetypal Nazirite, “Let Dan be a snake in the way, a serpent in the path, that biteth the horse’s heels that his rider may fall backward. I will look for thy salvation, O Lord” (Gen 49:17-8). While in some sources, the blessing given to Dan in Genesis 49:17 is interpreted as foreshadowing Christ, in others it is seen as reflecting the Antichrist. In this article, I explore how these Carolingian exegetes rose to the challenge of this conflict, by the examining the sources for both approaches available to them. I argue that both exegetes engaged with the sources in a manner that bypassed the paradox, each choosing a different way to do so.
ISSN:2329-4434
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of the bible and its reception
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/jbr-2020-0003