Concepts as Tools Not Rules: a Commentary on (Re-) Defining Racism
In (Re-) Defining Racism, Alberto Urquidez argues that conflicting philosophical accounts over the definition of racism are at bottom linguistic confusions that would benefit from a Wittgensteinian-inspired approach. In this essay, I argue that such an approach would be helpful in disputes over the...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Rezension |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2021, Band: 24, Heft: 3, Seiten: 661-666 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Rezension
B Racialization B Race B Racism |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | In (Re-) Defining Racism, Alberto Urquidez argues that conflicting philosophical accounts over the definition of racism are at bottom linguistic confusions that would benefit from a Wittgensteinian-inspired approach. In this essay, I argue that such an approach would be helpful in disputes over the definition of metaphysically contested concepts, such as “race,” or semantically contested concepts, such as “racialization.” I disagree, however, that such insights would prove helpful or do very little for disputes concerning normatively contested concepts, such as “racism.” |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-021-10173-9 |
