Benefiting from Wrongdoing and Moral Protest

Some normative theorists believe that there is a principled moral reason not to retain benefits realized by injustice or wrongdoing. However, critics have argued that this idea is implausible. One purported problem is that the idea lacks an obvious rationale and that attempts to provide one have bee...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindstad, Sigurd (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2021
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 753-765
Further subjects:B Corrective justice
B Black reparations
B climate justice
B Benefiting from injustice
B Expressive reasons
B Moral protest
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1772546968
003 DE-627
005 20211006112901.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211006s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-021-10194-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1772546968 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1772546968 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lindstad, Sigurd  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Benefiting from Wrongdoing and Moral Protest 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Some normative theorists believe that there is a principled moral reason not to retain benefits realized by injustice or wrongdoing. However, critics have argued that this idea is implausible. One purported problem is that the idea lacks an obvious rationale and that attempts to provide one have been unconvincing. This paper articulates and defends the idea that the principled reason in question has an expressive quality: it gets its reason-giving force from the symbolic aptness of such an act as an expressive response to wrongdoing. The paper thus argues that at least in a certain subset of cases, renouncing benefits realized by injustice amounts to a powerful and uniquely apt expression of protest against the disrespect for the victim that is implied by the wrongdoer’s actions. The paper shows how this idea can inform the question of reparations for slavery and its aftermath in the United States. Lastly it develops an important objection to the argument presented and gives an account of how this objection can be met. 
601 |a Protestant 
650 4 |a Benefiting from injustice 
650 4 |a Black reparations 
650 4 |a climate justice 
650 4 |a Corrective justice 
650 4 |a Expressive reasons 
650 4 |a Moral protest 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 24(2021), 3, Seite 753-765  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:753-765 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-021-10194-4.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10194-4  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3984767889 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1772546968 
LOK |0 005 20211006112645 
LOK |0 008 211006||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw