Korsets gåde - en undersøgelse af offerbegrebets filosofiske og teologiske implikationer

According to Asle Eikrem's book "God as Sacrificial love", the concept of the Christian God as a God of love is not coherent with the claim that Jesus was sacrificed on the cross for the redemption of human sins. Eikrem's conclusion builds on a conceptual framework that describes...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Knudsen, Annette Hjort (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Danish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: RPC 2020
In: Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Year: 2020, Volume: 83, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 83-101
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Language
B Love
B Coherence
B Crucifixion
B Humanity
B Sin
B Redemption
B Sacrifice
B Asle Eikrem
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1772388424
003 DE-627
005 20211005092811.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211005s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c
024 7 |a 10.7146/dtt.v83i3-4.125880  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1772388424 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1772388424 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a dan 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Knudsen, Annette Hjort  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Korsets gåde - en undersøgelse af offerbegrebets filosofiske og teologiske implikationer 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to Asle Eikrem's book "God as Sacrificial love", the concept of the Christian God as a God of love is not coherent with the claim that Jesus was sacrificed on the cross for the redemption of human sins. Eikrem's conclusion builds on a conceptual framework that describes the crucifixion as a self-sacrifice. His argument makes Jesus co-responsible, thus sanctioning the violent action. This way, evil becomes instrumental which is inconsistent with the notion of God as love. It is the intention of this article to show that (at least) one alternative conceptual framework makes it possible to maintain the view that the crucifixion was necessary for Jesus' redemptive mission. The crucifixion is thus not inconsistent with, but rather a consequence of the conception of God as love. For Jesus to realize God's incarnational intention of establishing a living fellowship with humanity is for him to realize a fellowship of experienced damnation followed by a truly redemptive resurrection. 
601 |a Implikation 
650 4 |a Asle Eikrem 
650 4 |a Coherence 
650 4 |a Crucifixion 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Humanity 
650 4 |a Language 
650 4 |a Love 
650 4 |a Redemption 
650 4 |a Sacrifice 
650 4 |a Sin 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Dansk teologisk tidsskrift  |d Frederiksberg : RPC, 2000  |g 83(2020), 3/4, Seite 83-101  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)847941736  |w (DE-600)2847336-X  |w (DE-576)455114366  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:83  |g year:2020  |g number:3/4  |g pages:83-101 
856 |u https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/download/125880/172782  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v83i3-4.125880  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 83  |j 2020  |e 3/4  |h 83-101 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3984400225 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1772388424 
LOK |0 005 20211005092811 
LOK |0 008 211005||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw