Typologies and Argumentation Tactics in Religious Polemics - An Analysis of al-Jawāb al Sahih and the Cyprus Letter

Christian-Muslim polemical exchanges and the relationship between the two faiths’ religious authorities in the medieval period were often rigid. One exchange between Christian theologians in Cyprus and Muslim theologians in Damascus is evidently polemical and exemplifies the difficult relations that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zwirahn, Faris (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Ruhr-Universität Bochum 2018
In: Entangled Religions
Year: 2018, Volume: 5, Pages: 44-94
Further subjects:B Paul of Antioch
B Ibn Taymiyya
B Polemics
B Christian-Muslim relations
B Religious Dialogue
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1772310484
003 DE-627
005 20230707093335.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211004s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.13154/er.v5.2018.44-94  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1772310484 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1772310484 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zwirahn, Faris  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Typologies and Argumentation Tactics in Religious Polemics - An Analysis of al-Jawāb al Sahih and the Cyprus Letter 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Christian-Muslim polemical exchanges and the relationship between the two faiths’ religious authorities in the medieval period were often rigid. One exchange between Christian theologians in Cyprus and Muslim theologians in Damascus is evidently polemical and exemplifies the difficult relations that occurred early in the fourteenth century and the nature of challenging religious arguments. That is The Letter from the People of Cyprus and Ibn Taymiyya’s response to it. This article offers a new analysis through the perspective of particular theoretical typologies of religious polemics. Accordingly, the article shows that these two polemicists adhere to multiple scriptural and rational tactics in support of their biased understanding of religious truth and the definition of impeccable revelations. It also shows that both theologians were involved in forceful and sometimes contradictory argumentative techniques. 
601 |a Typologie 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Christian-Muslim relations 
650 4 |a Ibn Taymiyya 
650 4 |a Paul of Antioch 
650 4 |a Polemics 
650 4 |a Religious Dialogue 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Entangled Religions  |d Bochum : Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 2014  |g 5(2018), Seite 44-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)802539181  |w (DE-600)2798882-X  |w (DE-576)416961657  |x 2363-6696  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2018  |g pages:44-94 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.13154/er.v5.2018.44-94  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/7255  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2018  |h 44-94 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3983717551 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1772310484 
LOK |0 005 20211004145522 
LOK |0 008 211004||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL