RT Article
T1 Marx, Chinese Marxism and poverty
JF Journal of global ethics
VO 17
IS 1
SP 42
OP 54
A1 Rockmore, Tom
LA English
YR 2021
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1771585331
AB The People’s Republic of China links Marxism to overcoming poverty. Different kinds of poverty include economic and non-economic or developmental forms. China seems to be or at least mainly concerned with economic poverty that, until the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, was widespread but rapidly receding. Marx is especially concerned with non-economic developmental poverty, the inability to go beyond meeting basic reproductive needs to develop as an individual human being. I argue that the Chinese effort to meet basic reproductive needs is directed towards overcoming poverty arising within capitalism, hence it fails to bring about the transition from capitalism to communism that Marx thinks is necessary for realizing human individuality. Contemporary China clearly deserves praise for its role in overcoming economic poverty. Yet poverty due to the inability to develop as a full developed human being in a contemporary social context is not now and was not then decreasing, but at the time of this writing is even increasing. If that is correct, then it is unclear that Chinese Marxism is now or even earlier prior to the pandemic was on the road to successfully alleviating poverty, so it is unclear that Marxism was or is an appropriate model for Chinese development.
K1 Human Development
K1 developmental poverty
K1 economic poverty
K1 Chinese Marxism
DO 10.1080/17449626.2021.1946838