Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science”

In their article “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” (Theology & Science 2020), Petteri Nieminen and colleagues compare the use of evidence in religion and science. Their claim is that religious use of evidence is characterized by “experiential” thinking and confirmation bias, w...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rope Kojonen, E. V. (Author)
Contributors: Nieminen, Petteri 1968- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2021
In: Theology and science
Year: 2021, Volume: 19, Issue: 3, Pages: 188-202
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B Fine Tuning
B Science and religion
B Social epistemology
B rationality of religious commitment
B historicity of Jesus
B Confirmation bias
B cognitive science of religion
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1767893418
003 DE-627
005 20240514092433.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210826s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14746700.2021.1944497  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767893418 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767893418 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rope Kojonen, E. V.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Bias in the Science and Religion Dialogue? A Critique of “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In their article “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” (Theology & Science 2020), Petteri Nieminen and colleagues compare the use of evidence in religion and science. Their claim is that religious use of evidence is characterized by “experiential” thinking and confirmation bias, which makes integration with science difficult. I argue, however, that their methodology is unreliable and their theory of religious cognition is too simplistic. Further research should take the complexity of “science,” “religion” and “rationality” more sufficiently into account. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Social epistemology 
650 4 |a historicity of Jesus 
650 4 |a Fine Tuning 
650 4 |a rationality of religious commitment 
650 4 |a Confirmation bias 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a Science and religion 
652 |a CF:NBF 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)1062528840  |0 (DE-627)805375902  |0 (DE-576)41977212X  |4 ant  |a Nieminen, Petteri  |d 1968- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology and science  |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003  |g 19(2021), 3, Seite 188-202  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372546447  |w (DE-600)2124364-5  |w (DE-576)261325019  |x 1474-6719  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:188-202 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Nieminen, Petteri, 1968 -   |t Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science  |d 2020  |w (DE-627)172783903X 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14746700.2021.1944497?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2021.1944497  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3971209742 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767893418 
LOK |0 005 20240228133141 
LOK |0 008 210826||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-25#60BA9C18FF432074EC8ED35431919EA024AA15E4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 

Similar Items

more