Bonaventure's I Sentence Argument for the Trinity from Beatitude
Bonaventure's Sentence Commentary provides the most comprehensive set of trinitarian arguments to date. This article focuses on just one of them, the one from beatitude. Roughly, beatitude can be thought of as God's enjoyment of his own, supreme goodness. After a brief rationale of Bonaven...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2021
|
| In: |
American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2021, Volume: 95, Issue: 4, Pages: 617-650 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1767659423 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210823112918.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210823s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpq2021728234 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1767659423 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1767659423 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-627)1234617366 |0 (DE-576)164617361 |4 aut |a Bray, Dennis | |
| 109 | |a Bray, Dennis |a Bray, D. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bonaventure's I Sentence Argument for the Trinity from Beatitude |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Bonaventure's Sentence Commentary provides the most comprehensive set of trinitarian arguments to date. This article focuses on just one of them, the one from beatitude. Roughly, beatitude can be thought of as God's enjoyment of his own, supreme goodness. After a brief rationale of Bonaventure's speculative project, I assay the concept of beatitude and exposit his four-stage argument. Bonaventure reasons: (i) for a single supreme substance; (ii) for at least two divine persons; (iii) against the possibility for an infinite number of divine persons; (iv) for at least three, and against the possibility of four (or more) divine persons. I show how this line of reasoning is significantly more complex than Bonaventure's terse summaries initially indicate. My main goal is to explicate the four steps and unpack their main support. Along the way I attend to the argument's sources, logical progression, and I respond to several concerns. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 601 | |a Beatitudes | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American catholic philosophical quarterly |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990 |g 95(2021), 4, Seite 617-650 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372353592 |w (DE-600)2122401-8 |w (DE-576)47637314X |x 2153-8441 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:617-650 |
| 856 | |u https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/25171/1/Bray_2021_Bonaventure_s_I_Sentence_Argument_for_the_Trinity_from_Beatitude.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021728234 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpq&id=acpq_2021_0095_0004_0617_0650 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3970726921 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1767659423 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210823112918 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210823||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||