La abstención en el Código de Derecho Canónico: derecho y obligación
The 1917 Code dealt with the abstention referred to abstinence and that of the judge, all individual acts, but did not take it into account to collegial acts. The current legislation has also introduced it for collegiate acts with the new system of computing the majority of votes. Despite this legis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2016
|
In: |
Revista española de derecho canónico
Year: 2016, Volume: 73, Pages: 489-523 |
IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
Further subjects: | B
Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1448, §2
B Task B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 158-163 B Law B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1449 B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 285 B Absence B Process B Judicial panel B Election B Diözesanrichter B Catholic church Codex Iuris Canonici 1917 B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 167, §1 B Duty B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 119 B Episcopal oeconomus B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 182, §2 |
Summary: | The 1917 Code dealt with the abstention referred to abstinence and that of the judge, all individual acts, but did not take it into account to collegial acts. The current legislation has also introduced it for collegiate acts with the new system of computing the majority of votes. Despite this legislative novelty, abstention has not aroused the interestof the comentators, except for the judge, likeas in previous legislation. The abstention from individual acts is an obligation to stop doing something, an inaction or omission because of the personal condition in the Church or the office, as the judge. In collegial acts it is a right and an obligation derived from the office performed by the person. Consequently, the law protects this right by imposing on the authority the obligation to call all those entitled and to recognize the freedom to vote and the possibility of abstaining in an election or decision on a matter. On the other hand, because of the content of the election and the subject, it imposes a moral and legal obligation to abstain. Vgl. cc 101; 240; 1243; 1613 CIC/1917 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0034-9372 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Revista española de derecho canónico
|