Canon 1673: Identifying the Competent Ecclesiological Court

Can the judicial vicar of the place where the respondent has a domicile or quasi-domicile delegate the moderator of the tribunal chancery to give consent, after having heard the respondent, to the claim of competence of the tribunal of the domicile of the petitioner in a maariage nullity case?

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beal, John P. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2013
Year: 2013, Pages: 120-121
IxTheo Classification:SB Catholic Church law
Further subjects:B Procedural law
B Competency
B Holy See (motif) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1673
B Court

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1763594831
003 DE-627
005 20241203093828.0
007 tu
008 210719s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 1932208364 
035 |a (DE-627)1763594831 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1763594831 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1032145072  |0 (DE-627)737975164  |0 (DE-576)183314026  |4 aut  |a Beal, John P. 
109 |a Beal, John P.  |a Beal, John 
245 1 0 |a Canon 1673: Identifying the Competent Ecclesiological Court 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Can the judicial vicar of the place where the respondent has a domicile or quasi-domicile delegate the moderator of the tribunal chancery to give consent, after having heard the respondent, to the claim of competence of the tribunal of the domicile of the petitioner in a maariage nullity case? 
610 2 7 |0 (DE-588)4797270-1  |0 (DE-627)702808318  |0 (DE-576)216431816  |a Katholische Kirche  |t Codex iuris canonici  |f 1983  |p can. 1673  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4047593-1  |0 (DE-627)106194186  |0 (DE-576)209074019  |a Prozessrecht  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4068155-5  |0 (DE-627)104340355  |0 (DE-576)209172908  |a Zuständigkeit  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4121346-4  |0 (DE-627)105770124  |0 (DE-576)209542543  |a Gericht  |2 gnd 
652 |a SB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2013  |d 2013  |g (2013), Seite 120-121  |h vii, 127 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1578295769  |w (DE-576)508295769  |z 1932208364 
773 1 8 |g year:2013  |g pages:120-121 
935 |a DAKR 
951 |a AR 
CAL |a 216730000_216739999 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3955880168 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1763594831 
LOK |0 005 20210719144250 
LOK |0 008 210719||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135-3)DAKAR1_47806 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-3  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 852 1  |c KR-S/II-117  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a msmi 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053313  |a SB 
LOK |0 939   |a 19-07-21  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Competency,Responsibility,Division of tasks,Task division,Jurisdiction,Court,Court,Procedural law,Proceedings,Trial law 
STB 0 0 |a Compétence,Droit procédural,Tribunal,Tribunal 
STC 0 0 |a Competencia,Derecho procesal,Tribunal,Tribunal,Corte,Corte,Juicio (Motivo),Juicio 
STD 0 0 |a Competenza,Diritto processuale,Tribunale,Tribunale 
STE 0 0 |a 法院,法庭,程序法,管辖权 
STF 0 0 |a 法院,法庭,程序法,管轄權 
STG 0 0 |a Competência,Direito processual,Tribunal,Tribunal,Foro,Corte,Foro,Corte,Juízo (Motivo),Juízo 
STH 0 0 |a Компетенция,Процессуальный закон,Суд (мотив),Суд 
STI 0 0 |a Αρμοδιότητα,Δικαστήριο (μοτίβο),Δικαστήριο,Δικονομικό δίκαιο 
SUB |a CAN 
SYE 0 0 |a Verfahrensrecht , Aufgabenverteilung,Kompetenz,Kompetenzverteilung,Kompetenzverteilung,Zuständigkeitsverteilung,Zuständigkeiten