Awareness of the right to appoint an advocate as essential to the right of defense

"A person in a marriage case petitions a tribunal for a declaration of nullity but is never informed that he or she can seek the assistance of an advocate. Furthermore, the person is unaware that he or she has the right to request the assistance of an advocate. Later, the person asserts that he...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Price, Lawrence G. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:Undetermined language
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Soc. 2009
In: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Year: 2009, Pages: 143-145
IxTheo Classification:SB Catholic Church law
Further subjects:B Procedural law
B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1620, §7
B Gerichtspersonal
B Catholic church Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1481
B Lawyer
B Recht auf Verteidigung

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 176358481X
003 DE-627
005 20210720001115.0
007 tu
008 210719s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||und c
035 |a (DE-627)176358481X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP176358481X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Price, Lawrence G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Awareness of the right to appoint an advocate as essential to the right of defense 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a "A person in a marriage case petitions a tribunal for a declaration of nullity but is never informed that he or she can seek the assistance of an advocate. Furthermore, the person is unaware that he or she has the right to request the assistance of an advocate. Later, the person asserts that he or she did not understand anything about the case and was unable to carry out a competent presentation of the case, which resulted in a finding of non constat. It also appears, upon further review, that the case was not well instructed and that there are facts that suggest nullity of consent. Can the first instance decision be declared null under canon 1620, 7°, based on a denial of the right of defense?" 
610 2 7 |0 (DE-588)1126587176  |0 (DE-627)881146463  |0 (DE-576)484580280  |a Katholische Kirche  |t Codex iuris canonici  |f 1983  |p can. 1481  |2 gnd 
610 2 7 |0 (DE-588)1126592889  |0 (DE-627)881149489  |0 (DE-576)484583069  |a Katholische Kirche  |t Codex iuris canonici  |f 1983  |p can. 1620, §7  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4047593-1  |0 (DE-627)106194186  |0 (DE-576)209074019  |a Prozessrecht  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4048755-6  |0 (DE-627)106189654  |0 (DE-576)209079134  |a Rechtsanwalt  |2 gnd 
650 4 |a Gerichtspersonal 
650 4 |a Recht auf Verteidigung 
652 |a SB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions  |d Washington, DC : Soc., 1984  |g (2009), Seite 143-145  |w (DE-627)170178897  |w (DE-600)1021371-5  |w (DE-576)033023980  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2009  |g pages:143-145 
935 |a DAKR 
936 u w |j 2009  |h 143-145 
951 |a AR 
CAL |a 214810000_214819999,216200799_216200799 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 395586717X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 176358481X 
LOK |0 005 20210719144122 
LOK |0 008 210719||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135-3)DAKAR1_46430 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-3  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-3 
LOK |0 852 1  |c KR-S/II-117  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a msmi 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053313  |a SB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Lawyer,Procedural law,Proceedings,Trial law 
STB 0 0 |a Avocat,Droit procédural 
STC 0 0 |a Abogado,Derecho procesal 
STD 0 0 |a Avvocato,Diritto processuale 
STE 0 0 |a 律师,程序法 
STF 0 0 |a 律師,程序法 
STG 0 0 |a Advogado,Direito processual 
STH 0 0 |a Адвокат,Процессуальный закон 
STI 0 0 |a Δικηγόρος,Δικονομικό δίκαιο 
SUB |a CAN 
SYE 0 0 |a Verfahrensrecht , Advokat,Anwalt,Rechtsanwaltschaft,Anwälte,Rechtsanwälte,Fürsprecher