Diocesan finance council and bishop's delegate: Canons 492
The diocesan bishop is often unable to be present for the meetings of the Diocesan Finance Council, due to his heavy schedule. Thus, he wants to appoint a delegate to preside in his absence. Two questions have arisen over who might serve as his delegate. First, should the delegate come from among th...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Εκτύπωση Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2006
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Έτος: 2002, Τόμος: 3, Σελίδες: 151-152 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | SB Κανονικό Δίκαιο, Δημόσιο Εκκλησιαστικό Δίκαιο |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Αντιπροσωπεία
B Καθολική Εκκλησία (μοτίβο) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 492 B Επίσκοπος (μοτίβο) B Επισκοπικό διοικητικό συμβούλιο περιουσιακών στοιχείων |
| Σύνοψη: | The diocesan bishop is often unable to be present for the meetings of the Diocesan Finance Council, due to his heavy schedule. Thus, he wants to appoint a delegate to preside in his absence. Two questions have arisen over who might serve as his delegate. First, should the delegate come from among the members of the council, or should it be someone not a member? Second, should (must?) this delegate be a cleric? |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|
