The Relevance (and Irrelevance) of Questions of Personhood (and Mindedness) to the Abortion Debate

Disagreements about abortion are often assumed to reduce to disagreements about fetal personhood (and mindedness). If one believes a fetus is a person (or has a mind), then they are “pro-life.” If one believes a fetus is not a person (or is not minded), they are “pro-choice.” The issue, however, is...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, David Kyle (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wipf and Stock Publishers 2019
In: Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry
Year: 2019, Volume: 1, Issue: 2, Pages: 121-153
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1761825933
003 DE-627
005 20210702155823.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210702s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.02  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1761825933 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1761825933 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1069226394  |0 (DE-627)821605097  |0 (DE-576)428551645  |4 aut  |a Johnson, David Kyle 
109 |a Johnson, David Kyle 
245 1 4 |a The Relevance (and Irrelevance) of Questions of Personhood (and Mindedness) to the Abortion Debate 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disagreements about abortion are often assumed to reduce to disagreements about fetal personhood (and mindedness). If one believes a fetus is a person (or has a mind), then they are “pro-life.” If one believes a fetus is not a person (or is not minded), they are “pro-choice.” The issue, however, is much more complicated. Not only is it not dichotomous—most everyone believes that abortion is permissible in some circumstances (e.g. to save the mother’s life) and not others (e.g. at nine months of a planned pregnancy)—but scholars on both sides of the issue (e.g. Don Marquis and Judith Thomson) have convincingly argued that fetal personhood (and mindedness) are irrelevant to the debate. To determine the extent to which they are right, this article will define “personhood,” its relationship to mindedness, and explore what science has revealed about the mind before exploring the relevance of both to questions of abortion’s morality and legality. In general, this article does not endorse a particular answer to these questions, but the article should enhance the reader’s ability to develop their own answers in a much more informed way. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry  |d Eugene, OR : Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2019  |g 1(2019), 2, Seite 121-153  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1699151458  |w (DE-600)3024742-1  |x 2637-7500  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:121-153 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.02  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.shermjournal.org/articles/the-relevance-(and-irrelevance)-of-questions-of-personhood-(and-mindedness)-to-the-abortion-debate  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 121-153 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3943693856 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1761825933 
LOK |0 005 20210702155823 
LOK |0 008 210702||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL