Legitimacy, Hate Speech, and Viewpoint Discrimination

Abstract One of the most powerful arguments against state regulation of expression has, in recent years, been presented in a reinvigorated and developed form. The argument in question maintains that state regulation of expression undercuts the legitimacy of the law because it involves the suppressio...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elford, Gideon 1980- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2021, Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 239-264
Further subjects:B freedom of expression
B Hate Speech
B Legitimacy
B viewpoint discrimination
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1761310518
003 DE-627
005 20210628103239.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210626s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-20203306  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1761310518 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1761310518 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1035822385  |0 (DE-627)749612290  |0 (DE-576)383581702  |4 aut  |a Elford, Gideon  |d 1980- 
109 |a Elford, Gideon 1980- 
245 1 0 |a Legitimacy, Hate Speech, and Viewpoint Discrimination 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract One of the most powerful arguments against state regulation of expression has, in recent years, been presented in a reinvigorated and developed form. The argument in question maintains that state regulation of expression undercuts the legitimacy of the law because it involves the suppression of a source of democratic contestation. The paper distinguishes between three importantly different versions of this legitimacy argument that existing work fails to clearly separate. Doing so is important because different forms of the legitimacy argument are supported by different considerations, vulnerable to different objections, and have different implications. Further, the paper levels two serious objections to legitimacy arguments against hate speech regulation. Firstly, it offers a consolidated defence of an extant rejoinder to the legitimacy argument, based on the claim that some person’s speech can ‘silence’ the expression of others. Secondly, the paper challenges the claim that the regulation of hate speech is necessarily viewpoint discriminatory. 
650 4 |a viewpoint discrimination 
650 4 |a Legitimacy 
650 4 |a Hate Speech 
650 4 |a freedom of expression 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 18(2021), 3, Seite 239-264  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:239-264 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jmp/18/3/article-p239_239.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20203306  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/18/3/article-p239_239.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 18  |j 2021  |e 3  |h 239-264 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3941474189 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1761310518 
LOK |0 005 20210626042656 
LOK |0 008 210626||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-06-25#EAF13E71937C4213E5D1C8E66C328BDB4D43138C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw