Medically assisted procreation and the protection of the embryo in vitro in international case law
Après 30 ans de développement, les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction ont non seulement été reconnues comme une méthode acceptable pour lutter contre l’infertilité humaine, mais elles doivent également être considérées comme un exemple de l’importance de la technoscience en tant qu’outil fond...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Éditions ESKA
2021
|
| In: |
Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences
Year: 2021, Volume: 32, Issue: 1, Pages: 75-94 |
| Further subjects: | B
Définition
B Case law B Regional Human Rights Protection B Definition B Protection régionale des droits de l’homme B Jurisprudence B Embryo in vitro B Embryon in vitro |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1761088939 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414193208.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210623s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3917/jibes.321.0075 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1761088939 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1761088939 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1090921586 |0 (DE-627)851725201 |0 (DE-576)166087432 |4 aut |a Byk, Christian |d 1955- | |
| 109 | |a Byk, Christian 1955- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Medically assisted procreation and the protection of the embryo in vitro in international case law |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Après 30 ans de développement, les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction ont non seulement été reconnues comme une méthode acceptable pour lutter contre l’infertilité humaine, mais elles doivent également être considérées comme un exemple de l’importance de la technoscience en tant qu’outil fondamental de transformation sociale et culturelle.En examinant la jurisprudence internationale relative à la protection de l’embryon in vitro, nous nous proposons d’examiner sur 3 exemples, qui décrivent la diversité et la complexité de la situation actuelle. Tous portent sur l’application des instruments ou législations régionales par les juridictions «supra» nationales: deux traitent du droit européen et le troisième concerne l’application de la Convention interaméricaine des droits de l’homme. On voit alors que l’étendue de la protection dépend de la définition donnée à l’embryon. | ||
| 520 | |a After 30 years of development, the New Reproductive Technologies have not only been acknowledged as an acceptable method to alleviate human infertility but they must also be regarded as an example of the importance of techno science as a fundamental tool of social and cultural transformation.The role of international and comparative law in this field is precisely to make us aware that those changes in the cultural and legal construction of the family are now global and imply to find a fair balanced approach of all the interest concerned. This might explain the function of but also the difficulties faced by international jurisdictions in defining how to combine those interests with the diversity of existing domestic legislation.Examining the international case law regarding the protection of the embryo in vitro, I would like to look on 3 examples, which describe the diversity and the complexity of the present situation. All of them focus on the application of regional instruments or legislation by “supra” national jurisdictions: two are dealing with European law and the third one concerns the application of the Inter american Convention on Human Rights. We can then see that the scope of the protection depends on the definition given to the embryo.The way the two European jurisdictions are approaching the issue -but not only this one- might be viewed as quite diffent and even opposed. In the field of Human Rights, the Court in Strasbourg is leaving a great margin of discretion to Members States while, in its own jurisdiction, the Court of Justice of the European Union is trying to reach common definition and interpretation to avoid unequal treatment…, After 30 years of development, the New Reproductive Technologies have not only been acknowledged as an acceptable method to alleviate human infertility but they must also be regarded as an example of the importance of techno science as a fundamental tool of social and cultural transformation.Examining the international case law regarding the protection of the embryo in vitro, I would like to look on 3 examples, which describe the diversity and the complexity of the present situation. All of them focus on the application of regional instruments or legislation by “supra” national jurisdictions: two are dealing with European law and the third one concerns the application of the Inter American Convention on Human Rights. We can then see that the scope of the protection depends on the definition given to the embryo., Après 30 ans de développement, les nouvelles technologies de la reproduction ont non seulement été reconnues comme une méthode acceptable pour lutter contre l’infertilité humaine, mais elles doivent également être considérées comme un exemple de l’importance de la technoscience en tant qu’outil fondamental de transformation sociale et culturelle.En examinant la jurisprudence internationale relative à la protection de l’embryon in vitro, nous nous proposons d’examiner sur 3 exemples, qui décrivent la diversité et la complexité de la situation actuelle. Tous portent sur l’application des instruments ou législations régionales par les juridictions «supra» nationales: deux traitent du droit européen et le troisième concerne l’application de la Convention interaméricaine des droits de l’homme. On voit alors que l’étendue de la protection dépend de la définition donnée à l’embryon. | ||
| 601 | |a Case law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Case law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Définition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Definition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Embryo in vitro | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Embryon in vitro | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Protection régionale des droits de l’homme | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Regional Human Rights Protection | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences |d Paris : Éditions ESKA, 2015 |g 32(2021), 1, Seite 75-94 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)867998458 |w (DE-600)2868565-9 |w (DE-576)477171990 |x 2608-1008 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:75-94 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.321.0075 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cairn.info/revue-journal-international-de-bioethique-et-d-ethique-des-sciences-2021-1-page-75.htm |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3940885002 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1761088939 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210623092533 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210623||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Case law,Definition |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Définition,Jurisprudence |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Definición,Derecho casuista |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Case law,Diritto giurisprudenziale,Diritto giurisprudenziale,Definizione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 定义,界说 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 判例法,定義,界說 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Definição,Direito casuísta |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Определение,Прецедентное право |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Νομολογία,Case law,Ορισμός |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Case-law,Fallrecht , Begriffsbestimmung,Begriffserklärung,Begriffsanalyse |