Individuation, Identity, and Resurrection in Thomas Jackson and John Locke
This paper outlines the views of two 17th century thinkers (Thomas Jackson and John Locke) on the question of the metaphysics of resurrection. I show that Jackson and Locke each depart from central 17th century Scholastic convictions regarding resurrection and philosophical anthropology (convictions...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2021
|
| In: |
American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2021, Volume: 95, Issue: 2, Pages: 165-194 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1760982318 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210622082210.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210622s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpq202147222 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1760982318 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1760982318 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1153227436 |0 (DE-627)1014675561 |0 (DE-576)500135452 |4 aut |a Thompson, Jon W. | |
| 109 | |a Thompson, Jon W. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Individuation, Identity, and Resurrection in Thomas Jackson and John Locke |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper outlines the views of two 17th century thinkers (Thomas Jackson and John Locke) on the question of the metaphysics of resurrection. I show that Jackson and Locke each depart from central 17th century Scholastic convictions regarding resurrection and philosophical anthropology (convictions laid out in section II). Each holds that matter or material continuity is not a plausible principle of diachronic individuation for living bodies such as human beings. Despite their rejection of the traditional view, they each provide a defence of the possibility of a personal afterlife. I outline these (quite different) defences in sections III-IV. I then argue (section V) that it is likely either that Locke had read Jackson on the issue of resurrection or that the two were influenced by a common source. I argue that matter might provide a suitable principle of diachronic individuation in both everyday cases of living bodies and in the case of resurrection. | ||
| 601 | |a Individuation | ||
| 601 | |a Resurrection | ||
| 601 | |a Jackson, Mo. | ||
| 601 | |a Locke, John | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American catholic philosophical quarterly |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990 |g 95(2021), 2, Seite 165-194 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372353592 |w (DE-600)2122401-8 |w (DE-576)47637314X |x 2153-8441 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:95 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:165-194 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq202147222 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpq&id=acpq_2021_0095_0002_0165_0194 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 394064109X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1760982318 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210622074812 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210622||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||