An Abhidharmic theory of welfare

Do Buddhist philosophical commitments support a particular theory of well-being? Most authors who have examined this question argue that Buddhist ideas are compatible with multiple theories of well-being. In this paper, I contend that one tradition of Buddhist philosophy—Abhidharma—does imply a spec...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hidalgo, Javier (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Carfax 2021
In: Asian philosophy
Year: 2021, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 254-270
Further subjects:B Hedonism
B Well-being
B Buddhism
B Abhidharma
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1760783277
003 DE-627
005 20210618042636.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210618s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09552367.2021.1899436  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1760783277 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1760783277 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hidalgo, Javier  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hidalgo, Javier  |a Hidalgo, J. 
245 1 0 |a An Abhidharmic theory of welfare 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Do Buddhist philosophical commitments support a particular theory of well-being? Most authors who have examined this question argue that Buddhist ideas are compatible with multiple theories of well-being. In this paper, I contend that one tradition of Buddhist philosophy—Abhidharma—does imply a specific theory of welfare. In particular, Abhidharma supports hedonism. Most Ābhidharmikas claim that only property-particulars called dharmas ultimately exist and I argue that an Abhidharmic theory of well-being should only refer to these properties. Yet the only dharmas that could plausibly be intrinsically good are phenomenal properties that are good in virtue of how they feel. Thus, the only intrinsically good things are pleasures. I defend this surprising conclusion from various interpretative objections and show that my argument can also inform contemporary philosophical debates about welfare. 
650 4 |a Hedonism 
650 4 |a Well-being 
650 4 |a Abhidharma 
650 4 |a Buddhism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Asian philosophy  |d London [u.a.] : Carfax, 1991  |g 31(2021), 3, Seite 254-270  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320310922  |w (DE-600)2025427-1  |w (DE-576)094080704  |x 1469-2961  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:254-270 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/HIDAAT.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1899436  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3939346845 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1760783277 
LOK |0 005 20210618042636 
LOK |0 008 210618||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-06-17#B8E9F881DCB8BB3870D1DF1820BC0768DFBD655C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL