Du recueil à l’invention du texte: le cas des Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai
The author considers the manuscript tradition of the Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai, with the goal to understand the nature of the text. Against the recent view which sees in this collection the product of «philosophers» of 8 th century, he thinks 1) that the collection is not unitary, 2) that it is...
| Опубликовано в: : | Byzantinische Zeitschrift |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Французский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
De Gruyter
2014
|
| В: |
Byzantinische Zeitschrift
Год: 2014, Том: 107, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 755-784 |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The author considers the manuscript tradition of the Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai, with the goal to understand the nature of the text. Against the recent view which sees in this collection the product of «philosophers» of 8 th century, he thinks 1) that the collection is not unitary, 2) that it is composed of two or more sections, and 3) that the text preserved by the codex Parisinus gr. 1336 is nearer to the dossier used by both the Anonymus Treu and the Patria Konstantinoupoleos. The author proceeds with some philological remarks and expresses the hypothesis that the manuscript was collection of works with historical contents and/or a depository of historical notes serving for the composition of a chronicle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1868-9027 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/bz-2014-0019 |