Reconceptualizing indigeneity in minority ethnic groups
Models of indigeneity and contextualization tend to overlook the impact of surrounding cultures on the culture and sense of identity of minority ethnic groups. Recent debate about ethnic groups and their cultures in anthropology provides essential theoretical foundations for examining this issue. Th...
Published in: | Missiology |
---|---|
Authors: | ; |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Published: |
Sage
2021
|
In: |
Missiology
Year: 2021, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 116-131 |
IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture KBA Western Europe RJ Mission; missiology |
Further subjects: | B
Ethnicity
B Millet B Minorities B Gypsies B Roma B Indigeneity B people groups B Identity B Culture |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Models of indigeneity and contextualization tend to overlook the impact of surrounding cultures on the culture and sense of identity of minority ethnic groups. Recent debate about ethnic groups and their cultures in anthropology provides essential theoretical foundations for examining this issue. This article begins by exploring these foundations and their implications for missiological conceptions of indigeneity and for fostering indigenous expressions of faith. Then, drawing on theories of acculturation, the dynamic and multifaceted influence of other (particularly more dominant) cultures on minority groups is discussed, using the case of the Turkish-speaking Millet in Bulgaria and their western European diaspora to illustrate this. The consequences of failing to recognize outside influence on minority groups include miscontextualization and misapplication of principles of indigeneity. These are illustrated through the case of the Millet. Finally, implications for missionary practice are drawn out. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2051-3623 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Missiology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0091829620972380 |