On how Chalcedonian Christology can be affirmed without the errors of Eutychianism and Nestorianism: A reply to Joshua Farris
In a recent article published in NZSTh, Joshua Farris follows up on the previous discussion between James Arcadi and myself concerning the abstractist/concretist Christological distinction. While affirming the significance of my Divine Preconscious Model (DPM) of the Incarnation, he argues that I ei...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
[2021]
|
In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2021, Volume: 63, Issue: 1, Pages: 110-121 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Nature
/ Metaphysics
/ Semantics
/ Monotheletism
/ Nestorianism
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDH Christian sects NBF Christology |
Further subjects: | B
Coherence of the Incarnation
B chalcedonische Chrstologie B "Divine Preconscious Model" B Appolinarianismus B Kohärenz der Inkarnation B concrete-nature B Apollinarianism B Chalcedonian Christology B Nestorianism B abstrakte Natur B konkrete Natur B abstract-nature B Eutychianismus B Eutychianism B Divine Preconscious Model |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |