RT Book
T1 Mere civility: disagreement and the limits of toleration
A1 Bejan, Teresa M. 1984-
LA English
PP Cambridge, Mass
PB Harvard University Press
YR 2017
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1756079986
AB Civility is often treated as an essential virtue in liberal democracies that promise to protect diversity as well as active disagreement in the public sphere. Yet the fear that our tolerant society faces a crisis of incivility is gaining ground. Politicians and public intellectuals call for "more civility" as the solution--but is civility really a virtue? Or is it something more sinister--a covert demand for conformity that silences dissent? Mere Civility sheds light on this tension in contemporary political theory and practice by examining similar appeals to civility in early modern debates about religious toleration. In seventeenth-century England, figures as different as Roger Williams, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke could agree that some restraint on the wars of words and "persecution of the tongue" between sectarians would be required; and yet, they recognized that the prosecution of incivility was often difficult to distinguish from persecution.--
AB Introduction: Wars of words -- "Persecution of the tongue" -- "Silver alarums": Roger Williams's "meer" civility -- "If it be without contention": Hobbes and civil silence -- "A bond of mutual charity": Locke and the quest for concord -- Conclusion: The virtue of mere civility -- Epilogue: Free speech fundamentalism.
OP 272
NO Based on the author's thesis (Ph. D.--Yale University, 2013)
NO Includes bibliographical references (pages 243-263) and index
CN BJ1533.C9
SN 0-674-97272-4
SN 978-0-674-97272-8
K1 Courtesy : Political aspects
K1 Toleration : Political aspects
K1 Discussion : Political aspects
K1 Freedom of speech
K1 Forums (Discussion and debate) : History
K1 FAMILY & RELATIONSHIPS ; Interpersonal Relations
K1 Forums (Discussion and debate)
K1 Höflichkeit
K1 Toleranz
K1 Redefreiheit
K1 Politische Ethik
K1 History
K1 Hochschulschrift