A Temporal First Cause?: Reply to Craig's Reply
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe implies that at the first moment of time, t1, God is both timeless and temporal, a contradiction (Wielenberg 2021). Craig responded to that argument; I here reply to Craig's resp...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
[2021]
|
| Em: |
TheoLogica
Ano: 2021, Volume: 5, Número: 1, Páginas: 93-96 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | NBC Deus VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Timeless God
B William Craig B Cosmological Argument B Kalam B agent causation |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig's theistic account of the origin of the universe implies that at the first moment of time, t1, God is both timeless and temporal, a contradiction (Wielenberg 2021). Craig responded to that argument; I here reply to Craig's response. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "No Trouble (2021)"
Kritik in "A Reply to Wielenberg on a Timeless First Cause (2021)" |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i1.60283 |