When Should we be Open to Persuasion?
Being open to persuasion can help show respect for an interlocutor. At the same time, open-mindedness about morally objectionable claims can carry moral as well as epistemic risks. Our aim in this paper is to specify when there might be duty to be open to persuasion. We distinguish two possible inte...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2021]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2021, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 123-136 |
| Further subjects: | B
Openness
B Ethics B Respect B Moral Psychology B Persuasion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1753274443 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210407151241.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210407s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-020-10153-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1753274443 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1753274443 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1079827765 |0 (DE-627)842234276 |0 (DE-576)452984513 |4 aut |a Davis, Ryan W. |d 1981- | |
| 109 | |a Davis, Ryan W. 1981- |a Davis, Ryan 1981- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a When Should we be Open to Persuasion? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2021] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Being open to persuasion can help show respect for an interlocutor. At the same time, open-mindedness about morally objectionable claims can carry moral as well as epistemic risks. Our aim in this paper is to specify when there might be duty to be open to persuasion. We distinguish two possible interpretations of openness. First, openness might refer to a kind of mental state, wherein one is willing to revise or abandon present beliefs. Second, it might refer to a deliberative practice, according to which one is willing to engage with opposing reasons. We suggest these two interpretations are conceptually and empirically distinct. Once disambiguated, we suggest that different contexts may make different forms of openness appropriate as expressions of respect. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Psychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Openness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Persuasion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Respect | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Finlayson, Rachel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 24(2021), 1, Seite 123-136 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:123-136 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10153-5 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3903113166 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1753274443 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210407143303 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210407||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||