Solus Verus Deus: Francis Cheynell and the Johannine Trinity
Scholars have identified the crucial importance of Johannine theology in the early modern anti-Trinitarian and Trinitarian debates. This article investigates Francis Cheynell’s defence of a Trinitarian reading of John 17:3, a highly controversial text in these debates. Modern scholarship has left im...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2021
|
| In: |
Reformation & Renaissance review
Year: 2021, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 68-91 |
| Further subjects: | B
John’s Gospel
B Trinity B Reformed Scholasticism B Metaphysics B Francis Cheynell B Socinianism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1752573501 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210326042544.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210326s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14622459.2020.1869372 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1752573501 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1752573501 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Slavinski, Sergiej S. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Slavinski, Sergiej S. |a Slavinski, Sergiej | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Solus Verus Deus: Francis Cheynell and the Johannine Trinity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Scholars have identified the crucial importance of Johannine theology in the early modern anti-Trinitarian and Trinitarian debates. This article investigates Francis Cheynell’s defence of a Trinitarian reading of John 17:3, a highly controversial text in these debates. Modern scholarship has left implicit the significance of John 17:3. Consequently, this article argues that, from Cheynell’s perspective, John 17:3 was the key text upon which Socinian rationalism found its compelling exegetical foothold and necessitated a Trinitarian response. This article demonstrates that Cheynell, in his exegesis of John 17:3, pursued a Nicene-Augustinian metaphysical line of literal exegesis to counter the unipersonal humanist thrust of Socinian exegesis. Indeed, this article advances the thesis that Johannine theology was at the forefront of the early modern polemics surrounding the Trinity. It also highlights the importance of the influence of Nicene-Augustinian thought upon the early modern Trinitarian reception of John’s Gospel. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reformed Scholasticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Socinianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John’s Gospel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trinity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Francis Cheynell | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Reformation & Renaissance review |d Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1999 |g 23(2021), 1, Seite 68-91 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341910236 |w (DE-600)2070807-5 |w (DE-576)260351768 |x 1743-1727 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:68-91 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1869372 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 23 |j 2021 |e 1 |h 68-91 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3894693878 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1752573501 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210326042544 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-03-25#5E6B7309715D0B98F45F6B6A4F4352AA4166FCBD | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||