Divine simplicity: some recent defenses and the prevailing challenge of analogical language
This essay’s aim is to demonstrate how recent defenses of divine simplicity have failed to address the prevailing challenge of analogical language, and thereby render much of their argumentation for simplicity’s appropriateness in Christian theology null-and-void. For this task, three book-length wo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 82, Issue: 1, Pages: 51-63 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Simplicity of God
/ Doctrine of analogy
/ Language
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
God-talk
B Divine Simplicity B theological language B proper proportionality B Thomas Cajetan B Thomas Aquinas B Analogy B Gender |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1752573439 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220209151738.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210326s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2020.1869061 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1752573439 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1752573439 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1230160086 |0 (DE-627)1752613198 |4 aut |a Misiewicz, Rory | |
| 109 | |a Misiewicz, Rory | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Divine simplicity: some recent defenses and the prevailing challenge of analogical language |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay’s aim is to demonstrate how recent defenses of divine simplicity have failed to address the prevailing challenge of analogical language, and thereby render much of their argumentation for simplicity’s appropriateness in Christian theology null-and-void. For this task, three book-length works published within the last few years are examined: Steven Duby’s Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account (2016), D. Stephen Long’s The Perfectly Simple Triune God: Aquinas and His Legacy (2016), and Jordan Barrett’s Divine Simplicity: A Biblical and Trinitarian Account (2017). The first section briefly details what each author understands divine simplicity to characterize, and how that characterization involves the pivotal denial of God belonging to any genus. The second section addresses the extent to which each author provides an answer as to how one can analogically speak of a simple God. Finally, the third section critiques the kinds of analogical positions found in Thomas Cajetan’s influential De Nominum Analogia, showing that they do not provide a sufficient analogical framework to ground intelligible propositions or inferences about a simple God, which thereby places the original three authors’ defenses in danger of serious incoherence. | ||
| 601 | |a Challenger | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomas Cajetan | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomas Aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theological language | |
| 650 | 4 | |a proper proportionality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Genus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God-talk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divine Simplicity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analogy | |
| 652 | |a NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1073234010 |0 (DE-627)828689512 |0 (DE-576)434756660 |2 gnd |a Einfachheit Gottes |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4203651-3 |0 (DE-627)10514939X |0 (DE-576)210156627 |2 gnd |a Analogielehre |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4056449-6 |0 (DE-627)106154745 |0 (DE-576)209117702 |2 gnd |a Sprache |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 82(2021), 1, Seite 51-63 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)731333985 |w (DE-600)2692945-4 |w (DE-576)381266621 |x 2169-2335 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:51-63 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2020.1869061 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3894693800 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1752573439 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220209151738 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-03-25#A73DD9D85D5652DD8C8BCA656448CE3794EE5055 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Doctrine of analogy,Gender,Grammatical gender,Language,Language,Simplicity of God,God |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Doctrine de l'analogie,Genre,Langage,Langage,Langue,Langue,Langue (motif),Langue,Simplicité divine |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Doctrina de analogía,Género gramatical,Lengua,Lengua,Idioma,Idioma,Lenguaje,Idioma (Motivo),Idioma,Simplicidad divina |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dottrina dell'analogia,Genere grammaticale,Lingua <motivo>,Lingua,Linguaggio,Linguaggio,Linguaggio (motivo),Linguaggio,Semplicità di Dio |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 性别,语言 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 性別,語言 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Doutrina de analogia,Gênero gramatical,Língua,Língua,Idioma,Idioma,Idioma (Motivo),Idioma,Simplicidade divina |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Простота Бога,Род (грамматика),Учение об аналогии,Язык (речь, мотив),Язык (речь) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απλότητα του Θεού,Γλώσσα (μοτίβο),Γλώσσα,Γραμματικό γένος,Δόγμα της αναλογίας |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Genussystem,Geschlecht,Grammatisches Geschlecht,Genera |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Göttliche Einfachheit,Gott , Scholastik , Sprachen |