Is Galatians an Ironic Letter?: Θαυµάζω, Ancient Letter Writing Handbooks, and Galatians 1:6

This article queries whether Paul wrote Galatians with reference to epistolary conventions for ironic letters. First, the author explores the use of the θαυµάζω + conjunction “epistolary formula” in the non-literary papyri to determine the relationship between this expression, irony, and Gal 1:6. Th...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Pawlak, Matthew 1991- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2021
Dans: Novum Testamentum
Année: 2021, Volume: 63, Numéro: 2, Pages: 249-270
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bibel. Galaterbrief 1,6 / Ironie / Littérature épistolaire / Rhétorique / Bibel. Galaterbrief
Classifications IxTheo:HC Nouveau Testament
Sujets non-standardisés:B letter writing handbooks
B Galatians
B Rhetoric
B Irony
B epistolary formula
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:This article queries whether Paul wrote Galatians with reference to epistolary conventions for ironic letters. First, the author explores the use of the θαυµάζω + conjunction “epistolary formula” in the non-literary papyri to determine the relationship between this expression, irony, and Gal 1:6. Then, he weighs the evidence for an ironic reading of Gal 1:6 itself before turning to the extant ancient letter writing handbooks to assess the extent to which Gal 1:6 meaningfully parallels the ironic letters in the handbooks. The author argues that while an ironic reading of Gal 1:6 is plausible, there is no evidence that Paul has crafted Galatians with reference to epistolary conventions for ironic letters.
ISSN:1568-5365
Contient:Enthalten in: Novum Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685365-12341694