Scientific Uniformity or “Natural” Divine Action: Shifting the Boundaries of Law in the Nineteenth Century

In October 1862, the Duke of Argyll published an article in the Edinburgh Review entitled “The Supernatural.” In it, Argyll argued that contrary to the prevailing assumption, miracles were “natural” rather than “supernatural” acts of God. This reconceptualization was a response to the controversial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zygon
1. VerfasserIn: Bossoh, Nathan K. C. ca. Geburtsjahr 1991/1992 (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2021]
In: Zygon
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Argyll, George Douglas Campbell of 1823-1900 / Das Übernatürliche / Wunder / Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung
IxTheo Notationen:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
CF Christentum und Wissenschaft
weitere Schlagwörter:B German higher criticism
B New Reformation
B Miracles
B neo-Newtonians
B Duke of Argyll
B evidentialists
B Rationalists
B John Tyndall
B Baden Powell
B Supernatural
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In October 1862, the Duke of Argyll published an article in the Edinburgh Review entitled “The Supernatural.” In it, Argyll argued that contrary to the prevailing assumption, miracles were “natural” rather than “supernatural” acts of God. This reconceptualization was a response to the controversial publication Essays and Reviews (1860), which challenged orthodox Biblical doctrine. Argyll's characterization of a miracle was not novel; a number of early modern Newtonian thinkers had advanced the same argument for similar reasons. New in this nineteenth-century reconceptualization, however, were (1) the recent geological, physical, and evolutionary developments and (2) the introduction of German higher criticism. Argyll and the neo-Newtonians thus attempted to construct a philosophico-theological alternative, which would constitute a middle-position between the traditional acceptance and liberal rejection of miracles. I argue finally that 21st-century debates on divine action in fact exist as part of a longer historical tradition that dates back to Augustine.
ISSN:1467-9744
Enthält:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12678