A Further Look at the Cave 1 Hodayot Scroll: The Material Evidence
The DJD 40 edition of the Cave 1 Hodayot scroll by Hartmut Stegemann and Eileen Schuller put forward an extensive material reconstruction of the scroll based on Stegemann’s work from the 1960s onwards. Parts of this reconstruction were recently challenged by Angela Kim Harkins, who offered a second...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Peeters
2020
|
In: |
Revue de Qumran
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 195-211 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Reconstruction
/ Analysis
/ Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls
/ Hodayot (Qumran Scrolls)
/ Höhle 1, Qumran
|
IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible HH Archaeology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The DJD 40 edition of the Cave 1 Hodayot scroll by Hartmut Stegemann and Eileen Schuller put forward an extensive material reconstruction of the scroll based on Stegemann’s work from the 1960s onwards. Parts of this reconstruction were recently challenged by Angela Kim Harkins, who offered a second look on this Cave 1 Hodayot scroll. She suggests that cols. II-VIII were not materially part of this scroll and presents a scenario which explains why the scroll was separated into a bundle with a few sheets, and a bundle with other fragments. This article looks further at the evidence of the Cave 1 Hodayot scroll that pertains to some of Harkins’s analyses and proposals. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2506-7567 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue de Qumran
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RQ.32.2.3289039 |