The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation
This paper attempts to investigate Kierkegaard’s thought through the category of mimesis. First, two meanings of the word are distinguished and analyzed: the archaic meaning that links it to the concept of re-enactment, and the traditional meaning that links it to the aesthetic field of art. These t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
[2020]
|
In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2020, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 85-110 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBE Anthropology NCB Personal ethics VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This paper attempts to investigate Kierkegaard’s thought through the category of mimesis. First, two meanings of the word are distinguished and analyzed: the archaic meaning that links it to the concept of re-enactment, and the traditional meaning that links it to the aesthetic field of art. These two meanings are then considered in relation to Kierkegaard’s opus, showing the oscillation of mimesis as corresponding to that between the aesthetic, which lives in fantasy and in the unfulfilled possibility, and the religious, which finds its identity in the imitation of Christ and in the transparent relationship to God. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0005 |