Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities: The Mingling of Some Qumran Cave 4 and Cave 6 Fragments
Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves....
| 發表在: | Dead Sea discoveries |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
2021
|
| In: |
Dead Sea discoveries
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Damaskusschrift (Qumrantexte)
/ Provenienzforschung
/ Höhle 4, Qumran
/ 4Q269
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HD Early Judaism |
| Further subjects: | B
PAM 41.734
B Provenance B 6Q15 B Qumran Cave 4 B Qumran / Höhle 6 B Damascus Document B Qumran Cave 6 |
| 在線閱讀: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5179 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685179-20201001 |